PhD Defence Romy Richter
Supervisor: Prof. dr. Trudy van der Weijden
Co-supervisors: Dr. Esther Giroldi, Dr. Jesse Jansen
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, risk communication, patient preferences, health literacy
"From dialogue to decision: Exploring medical options, benefits and harms, and patient preferences in different clinical contexts"
This dissertation explores how to enhance shared decision-making (SDM) in healthcare by examining the communication of medical options, their potential benefits and harms (option talk and risk communication), and patient preference elicitation. Communicating these aspects can be abstract and complex, posing challenges in clinical practice. Previous research highlights healthcare professionals' need for clear communication strategies and supportive tools, particularly for engaging patients with limited health literacy in SDM.
The dissertation provides insights and recommendations for effective risk communication strategies and examines how clinical contexts influence this process. It incorporates perspectives from key stakeholders, including clinicians, experts, and patients with limited health literacy. Additionally, it evaluates Patient Decision Aids, tools designed to support option talk and risk communication. This dissertation also explored the use of the Outcome Prioritization Tool (OP) to support the often-abstract task of eliciting patient preferences in practice.
Click here for the livestream.
Also read
-
PhD Defence Maarten Voorhaar
"Tailored self-management support for people living with COPD"
24 Apr -
PhD Defence Demi Michaela Elisabeth Pagen
"The spectrum of COVID-19 epidemiology: from public health alarm state to long-term struggle"
24 Apr -
PhD Defence Filippo Ronald Zimbile
"Using Stepped Care to Strategically Organize Ehealth and Promote Self-care: Experiences From Public Sexual Health Care in the Netherlands"
24 Apr