The award is intended, according to COST, as “a flexible, fast, effective and efficient networking instrument for researchers, engineers and scholars to cooperate and coordinate nationally funded research activities. COST Actions allow European researchers to jointly develop their own ideas in any science and technology field.”

Collaborators far and wide

It’s still early days for GAMENET, which will bring together disciplinarily diverse scholars including applied mathematicians, operations researchers, economists and computer scientists. They’re a geographically diverse lot, too. But when you ask Staudigl – who came to UM two years ago from Bielefeld University “because of Maastricht’s strong reputation in game theory” – how many universities will participate, he laughs and says it would be easier to count the countries.

“In two months, we’ve had 15 countries – out of 25 possible in the EU – sign the memorandum of understanding. We also have Singapore, the US and Canada, and I just received an inquiry from Australia. I hope to have 24 countries when we start officially on 18 October this year.” Closer to home, Staudigl’s GAMENET collaborators include SBE colleagues Hans Peters, Matthias Mnich, Janos Flesch and Dries Vermeulen.

Despite the challenges of working with so many scholars around the world, there’ll be no hanging around, according to the man whose GAMENET title is, appropriately enough, Action Chair: “We’ve already organizing, and we already have some ideas for conferences next year.”

He adds: “We have one working group on the algorithmic aspects of game theory and mechanism design, with concrete applications in routing and traffic engineering; we have a working group on learning dynamics and optimization theory; we will collaborate with the telecommunications industry, and we have a working group on fundamental methods in stochastic games – pure theory, so to speak.”

Viennese roots

Staudigl, a mathematician, comes by his interest in game theory honestly.“I did my studies in Vienna, where game theory was created by John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern. When I was a graduate student, the mathematics and economics faculties [of the University of Vienna] joined and created a new university at the Oskar-Morgenstern-Platz, and game theory was one of the main drivers. I was focusing on game theory by the time I was writing my master’s thesis, which is not standard for a mathematician, because it’s way too applied. I was a postdoc in a research group of mathematical biology, and then a postdoc at economics faculties – so I know both sides of the world, so to speak,” he observes.

While nearly all scholars can point to the interdisciplinary nature of their work, game theory is a particularly good place to cross boundaries. “It shows how effective mathematical tools can be for tackling many important issues independently of the context where they appear. It’s a common set of tools, and it applies to many things. That’s what’s most fascinating to me. I see it as the structure behind the arguments and the theories and the models,” Staudigl says.

Politics to machine learning 

How would he explain game theory to someone unfamiliar with the concept? Where can we find it in our own lives?
“The most transparent example is politics. All politics is about playing games, and one of the main drivers of game theoretic research was the Cold War era. ‘What is happening with the Russians?’ ‘How should we react?’.” Then as now, Staudigl says, game theory was “present in everyday newspapers. You just have to read carefully and it’s right there.” 

Today, its role in data science is key, he adds. “It’s a classic statistics problem: you have some environment in which you are acting, the data are coming at you, and you don’t really know how they are generated, but still you have to play optimally with these data, meaning making a good prediction about the future.

“It is nearly a universal phenomenon in all interactive systems. Game theory, now, is one the most important theories in how to make sense of a huge amount of data coming in and out, without any strong distribution of assumptions. Knowing what to do with it, how to process it and what to learn from it is essential.”

Read more about the European Network for Game Theory.