VWR Winter meeting
A duty to disobey?
Should the law be disobeyed when it is perceived to be unjust – by judges or civil servants in particular, but also more generally? The childcare benefits scandal in the Netherlands is one of many historical and current, national and international examples which have raise this question. We will be examining the issue at the VWR 2022 winter meeting.
In different talks, we will analyse or consider the question of a duty to disobey in a more specific light. Here, one might for example think of
- Are there differences regarding the duty to disobey between civil servants, judges and the general population?
- Is there a difference between refusing general conscription and refusing to apply the law as a civil servant?
- Is the duty to disobey, if it exists, a legal or a moral one? What implications would this have?
- What is the meaning of the doctrine of contra legem is this regard? Is a decision contra legem a form of disobedience or not?
- What is the relationship between a supposed duty to disobey and the rule of law?
- Can the Toeslagenaffaire provide an angle from which we could contemplate in- and exclusion from the law – the parent who makes a mistake; the civil servant who might decide not to follow the law to the letter?
- How can conscientious objectors account for their actions?
- How can a community demand of civil servants not to follow the law?
- Where do the questions of legal philosophy (‘when is disobedience mandatory?’) and politics and political accountability (‘what kind of community seeks accountability at the level of administration and jurisdiction, but not of politics?’) meet?
- (If there is a duty to disobey), how can we offer those who disobey (and e.g. whistleblowers) better protection?
- Does it matter whether the law that ought to be disobeyed is municipal, national, regional, or international?
These questions are illustrative and non-exhaustive.
Programme
11.15 | General Members Meeting VWR (NL) in room KAP 1.028 (entrance Kapoenstraat 2) |
12.00 | Lunch |
13.00 | Opening of the meeting (in plenary) in room KAP 1.028 (entrance Kapoenstraat 2) |
13.15 |
Dutch Session:
|
15.15 | Coffee break |
15.45 |
English Session:
|
17.15 | Closing and drinks |
![vw](/sites/default/files/2023-03/vwr_5_logo_groot_tekst.jpg)
Maastricht University, Faculty of Law
Room KAP 1.028, 1st. floorContact: Chantal Meertens, Law Events Office
Organizers:
Antonia M. Waltermann, Assistant Professor, Foundations and methods of Law, Faculty of Law
Eric van de Luijtgaarden
Arthur Willemse
Mathijs Notermans
Eline Couperus
Aravind Ganesh
Relevant links
Also read
-
05 Sep 06 Sep09:00 - 17:30
IP & Competition in an era of AI and Data: Assessing global trends from a comparative & interdisciplinary lens
To unknot the complex debate on innovation in the digital age, we bring together inter-disciplinary experts to discuss the interplay between Generative AI, competition, intellectual property and innovation in the era of big data & AI.
-
15 Sep 17 Dec12:00
TEGL CONFERENCE
The Globalization and Law Network invites you to the TEGL Annual Conference. The conference is aimed at scholars, practitioners, and experts wanting to contribute to an engaging exploration of the intricate relationship between law and uncertainty. In an era marked by unprecedented global challenges...
-
25 Sep 27 Sep
The Right to Social Security: a new dawn!
The Conference "The Right to Social Security: a new dawn!" brings together the MoveS seminar on EU Fundamental Rights for cross-border workers, Prof. Vonk's inaugural lecture, and the annual EISS conference on Contemporary Challenges for the Fundamental Right of Social Security.